The manufacturing landscape is undergoing a rapid transformation. With global competition intensifying, customers demanding personalised solutions, and the shift towards sustainable and circular practices becoming a business necessity [9, 2], the time for change is now. Yet, many manufacturing companies still operate with product and service development processes designed for a different era. If your development cycle feels more like a rigid assembly line than a dynamic, adaptive system, initiating a critical re-evaluation is crucial.


Traditional development processes, often characterised by sequential stage-gate models, were designed for predictability and control [1, 7]. While valuable in their time, these approaches are increasingly struggling. Their inherent rigidity can stifle innovation, slow time-to-market, and make it incredibly difficult to adapt to rapidly changing market demands and the urgent need for sustainability [2, 9]. Designing for circularity requires a holistic, iterative approach, something existing development processes may not easily accommodate [3].


Common bottlenecks observed in traditional development processes further exacerbate the challenges. These often include:

  • Siloed departments: Poor cross-functional collaboration between design, engineering, manufacturing, and post-sale services can lead to costly rework and missed opportunities [9].

  • Resistance to change: Entrenched processes often mean that incorporating new materials, technologies, or business models (like product-as-a-service) faces internal friction [5].

  • Limited data integration: A lack of real-time data and feedback loops from manufacturing or products in the field prevents agile responses and continuous improvement [4].

  • Late consideration of manufacturability and sustainability: Design for Manufacturing (DFM) and Design for Environment (DfE) principles, if not integrated early and iteratively, lead to inefficient production, higher costs, and greater environmental impact [1, 2].


Today's manufacturing challenges starkly highlight the shortcomings of these legacy processes. How can companies effectively compete globally if their development pipelines are slow and inflexible? How can they meet ambitious sustainability targets or embrace circular economy models if their processes inherently generate waste and aren't designed for product end-of-life [3]?


The answer lies in reengineering your product and service development processes. This means embracing methodologies like Agile and Lean or combinations of methodologies (e.g., lean development), which promote flexibility, customer collaboration, waste reduction, and rapid iteration [6]. It also involves leveraging digital tools for better simulation, virtual prototyping, and data analytics across the product lifecycle [8]. Integrating service development alongside product development from the outset is also important, especially for circular business models.

Transitioning 'beyond the assembly line' in your product or service development thinking is no longer a choice. It's a necessity for fostering innovation, accelerating speed-to-market, and building a resilient, sustainable, and competitive manufacturing business for the future. The sooner you embrace this change, the sooner you can start reaping the benefits of a more efficient and sustainable manufacturing process.


Growth Lantern helps manufacturers overcome their product and service development process challenges. Our structured approach to overcoming these challenges starts with a clear understanding of the needs of your (product or service development) organisation. For more information on our approach, visit the link here.


References

[1] Debutify. (n.d.). A Guide to the Product Development Process. Retrieved from debutify.com

[2] FasterCapital. (n.d.). Challenges In Traditional Manufacturing. Retrieved from fastercapital.com

[3] Buro Happold. (2025, May 8). In Conversation with Kathleen Hetrick: 5 things to think about to achieve circular design. Retrieved from burohappold.com (Note: While the date is in the future, this reflects the latest available search result on this topic. The principles are current.)

[4] ThroughPut AI. (2024, January 4). How To Eliminate Bottlenecks in Manufacturing in 2025. Retrieved from throughput.world

[5] Mindbowser. (n.d.). Product Reengineering Process: A 6 Step Guide. Retrieved from mindbowser.com

[6] FourJaw. (2024, April 12). Comparing Lean and Agile Manufacturing Principles: Which Is Best Suited for Your Process? Retrieved from fourjaw.com

[7] TCGen. (2024, March 21). What is the Stage-Gate Process? Pros and Cons. Retrieved from tcgen.com

[8] Moon Technolabs. (2025, March 7). The Complete Guide to Digital Product Development. Retrieved from moontechnolabs.com (Note: While the date is in the future, this reflects the latest available search result on this topic. The principles are current.)

[9] Qmarkets. (2025, January 14). Innovation in Manufacturing: Industry Trends and Challenges. Retrieved from qmarkets.net (Note: While the date is in the future, this reflects the latest available search result on this topic. The principles are current.)

Let’s Illuminate Your Growth Journey

Whether you’re aiming to streamline product development, explore new business models, or launch with confidence — Growth Lantern is here to guide you.our next level begins with one simple step.

text

text

CTA Block Image

Let’s Illuminate Your Growth Journey

Whether you’re aiming to streamline product development, explore new business models, or launch with confidence — Growth Lantern is here to guide you.our next level begins with one simple step.

text

CTA Block Image